Bugatti Veyron vs Euro Fighter – Top Gear – BBC

Bugatti Veyron vs Euro Fighter - Top Gear - BBC

1 million subscribers and counting! To celebrate, we’re giving the fans what they want – our most popular clip ever, in all its glory. Car vs Jet Plane. Watch this amazing challenge as Richard Hammond races a Euro Fighter Typhoon in the Bugatti Veyron. Who will win the horizontal vs vertical 2 mile race? See the challenge here in full! Subscribe to see all the reviews, races and challenges: bit.ly Top Gear YouTube channel: www.youtube.com TopGear.com website: www.topgear.com Top Gear Facebook www.facebook.com Top Gear Twitter: twitter.com Latest Top Gear videos: bit.ly
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Technical Editor Michael Austin gets a first drive review of the 2013 SRT Viper. Subscribe! bit.ly Read the full article here: bit.ly CARS: SRT Viper LOCATION: GingerMan Raceway, Michigan MAG EDITORS: Michael Austin Connect To Car and Driver: Twitter: bit.ly Facebook: on.fb.me Hosted by the editors of Car and Driver magazine, this show puts the audience into the action on new-car reviews, comparison tests, auto-show coverage, and more. Our experts drive and test the latest models, attend automotive events around the world, and check out the latest in-vehicle technology like massaging seats and night-vision systems. Viewers will also have the opportunity to write in and extend the conversation. Each week, the Car and Driver YouTube Channel will launch episodes of Driver Rehab, Car and Driver: Abroad, Car and Driver: Tested, Popular Mechanics Saturday Mechanic, and Road & Track Presents.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

49 thoughts on “Bugatti Veyron vs Euro Fighter – Top Gear – BBC

  1. yea but when it was going up it was going against gravity, which cancels out the advantage.

  2. Eurofighter. ROFL! No stealth and no VTOL. I’ll take a F-22 or F35 any day of the week.

  3. Only have air resistance acting on their bodies the car is colder to the ground so it would have a lower centre of gravity but it’s alright because it has a frictional force on the tyres where the jet doesn’t correct me if.ive said anything wrong I only do physics at college

  4. weight of the jet acts downwards which is the mass times 9.81=gravity , the weight acts against the jet on the climb, force=mass x acceleration so acceleration= force/mass mass of jet is constant but the downwards force is more because the resultant force is in the direction of acceleration, imagine weight as 4 and gravity as 2 on the way UP it’s acceleration= 4-2/ mass which we can say it’s 2 giving us 1 on the way down it’s 4+2/2=3

    If the jet flew horizontal it would be fairer they would

  5. Yes, but it also had gravity pulling it down when it was going up, too.

  6. It WAS French. Bugatti has been owned by Volkswagen since 1998, which is a German company.

  7. You know Gilles Villeneuve actually beated a jet plane in his F1 car
    watch?v=PqNwDJonNzo

  8. i know the BV is a masterpiece, but did anyone truly believe the Euro would lose?

  9. Kinda wasn’t fair for the Bugatti cause when the jet u turned it has gravity pulling him down and going faster.

  10. the thing is that the car had 2 slow down and gain speed the jet didnt have 2 slow down to much at least to do the flip and has gravity helping it

  11. Excuse me everyone, I’m American, but in reality this thing is ugly, I think it’s one of the ugliest sports cars ever made,,, shall have power and everything, but very ugly, so I’ll stick with Nissan and Porsche, are more cute and very power

  12. i would say yes, it is looking to be similar quality to an r8, yet half the cost for your brutish v10.

  13. Go price the other Supercars in its performance range and see what you’d have to pay. I hope you got a way bigger ass for that LOL idiot.

  14. Oooo its a 3 door hatchback, I know put it in the next hot hatch comparo, watch out VW GTI LOL

  15. the NEW Dodge Viper SRT car, that’s my friendly car. That’s so GOOD.

  16. And how many people are going to buy the car and actually push it to it’s max ability to where the ” functional vents ” are useful?

  17. I’m glad they put the Vette engine into the CTS-V aswell, both great engines.

  18. Didn’t they loose the Chrysler (Dodge) badge and just call it the SRT Viper now?

  19. how many people make 8.4L quad cams that you can compare? Not too many that im aware of why? because they are outdated technology. the new Mustang GT’s are kicking around like 412hp last i checked out of a 5L. with basic specs like that in that engine theoretically it would punch out 692hp if it was a 8.4L… the OHV sure makes alot less than that.

  20. there are so many variables there… 8.4l vs 5l…type of car, supercar vs glorified sedan, fuel economy has much more to do with gearing, the weight of the engine relies heavily on what it is made of. Being that it is a 8.4L vs a 5L… which is roughly 40% smaller. there are many holes in your arguement. Find an equal comparison that actually works if you are going to do it.

  21. A properly designed gearbox is there to keep you in the powerband. tighter gears for a smaller powerband so you never fall to far from your peak. EX. F1 race cars…their powerband is in the stratosphere, with all those multimillion dollar engineers working for them surely you should tell them they need mid range power.

  22. I totally agree with that. I mean what was he talking about saying that every airvent has a purpouse??? I have never seen that much airvents on a porsche or a ferrari… And those cars are much and much better made,not only design but technologywise…

Napsat komentář k AdurianJ Zrušit odpověď na komentář

Vaše emailová adresa nebude zveřejněna. Vyžadované informace jsou označeny *

*

Můžete používat následující HTML značky a atributy: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>